Describe a case in plain words. ForensiLaw maps it to the fields the analysis uses, writes the prosecution and defence accounts as propositions, then reports what testing could and could not show.
Your work stays in this browser tab while it is open and is erased when you close the tab. Nothing is sent to or kept on the server. Download or print anything you want to keep for good.
Step 1
Describe the scenario
Names you list are replaced with [Person A], [Person B] before anything leaves this page. Nothing is stored on the server; close the tab and it is gone.
Keep a copy to regenerate later.
Set fields by hand (optional)
Fill only what you already know. These are taken as fact and merged with your written account; where the two disagree, the field you set here wins. Leave the rest blank and the text fills them in.
Step 2
How ForensiLaw read your scenario
These are the fields the analysis will use. Change anything that is wrong, then write the report. The note under each field shows where the value came from.
The two accounts, as propositions
Prosecution
Defence
What would change the analysis
Where a question can be answered from a known field, a dropdown is offered. Answering it updates the fields above; then write the report.
Your answers, and the questions that prompted them, are added to the scenario text above, then the scenario is mapped again.
Procedures only in this version; the research literature is not yet connected. "Compare scenarios" carries this scenario into the comparison tool as a starting column.
Step 3
Report
What testing could show
What testing cannot show
Variables that would change the answer
What to ask for in disclosure
What the other side can say
Not covered
Expert
Procedure extracts cited
Ref
Source
Section
Page
Counsel preparation only. Not expert evidence. Procedures are those of US public laboratories and the ENFSI guideline; a Canadian laboratory's method may differ.